
A FORMEX Readiness Snapshot is a preliminary, certification-style output generated from structured intake responses. It helps reveal whether an opportunity is ready for direct review, capital pathway mapping, or further formation work.
Greg.ai asks focused structural questions, then organizes the responses into a FORMEX-style readiness summary. This helps founders, operators, social enterprises, and capital partners see whether formation is aligned enough to proceed.
Clarifies decision authority, role definition, timing, economics, and reporting integrity.
Shows whether capital is likely to create leverage or pressure at the current stage.
Identifies whether to clarify formation, prepare for review, or escalate to Greg for structured engagement.
Every Greg.ai intake produces a preliminary readiness score. Understanding where your opportunity falls determines the right next move — whether that's formation work, structural clarification, or escalation to a full FORMEX evaluation.
Formation not ready. Capital introduced at this stage may increase risk rather than create leverage. Foundational structural work is required before any capital discussion.
Conditional readiness. Structural clarification is required. Key gaps in authority, sequencing, or signal integrity must be addressed before proceeding to review.
Structurally aligned for focused FORMEX evaluation. The opportunity demonstrates sufficient formation clarity to support a direct review and capital pathway mapping.

Generated from Greg.ai Intake Responses — the following structure represents the nine components of every readiness output produced by Greg.ai.
The opportunity appears to be: Formation Ready / Conditionally Ready / Still Forming / Not Yet Ready. Greg.ai summarizes the overall readiness posture in 3–5 sentences.
Overall Preliminary Readiness Score: ___ / 100
This score indicates whether the opportunity is structurally ready for review, still forming, or premature for capital discussion.
Greg.ai identifies the clearest structural strengths based on the user's responses.
Greg.ai identifies gaps that may prevent capital, pilot deployment, or strategic engagement from moving efficiently.
Stewardship: Who decides?
Structure: What exists?
Sequencing: When should capital move?
Scalability: Where can it replicate?
Sustainability: Why does it endure?
Signal Integrity: How is it verified?
Greg.ai explains whether capital is likely to create leverage or pressure at the current stage of formation.
Possible next steps include clarifying authority, defining roles, quantifying outcomes, strengthening reporting, preparing for FORMEX review, or routing to Greg for structured engagement.
Who has final authority over capital and deployment?
What must be true before capital is introduced?
What assumptions are currently unverified?
What outcome data would make this fundable?
What would break if the model scaled quickly?
9. FORMEX Positioning Summary
Greg.ai surfaces the structure. FORMEX verifies it before capital moves.
What Greg.ai Can Produce Before FORMEX Engagement